Judicial delay has been the customary analysis of the problem of case pendency in India, but delay is merely the tip of the iceberg of structural restraints in the justice delivery system. The courts around the nation are under heavy resource constraints, archaic administration, complexity of procedures and lack of balanced technological adoption. The institutional capacity of the judiciary has not grown in line with population expansion, economic activity and the growth in rights consciousness. This chapter is solution centric in dealing with the problem. It works on the assumption that it is impossible to make substantial reductions in pendency by individual reforms or interventions in bits and pieces. Rather, it needs a concerted approach that can enhance judicial capacity at the same time enhancing the use of technology to modernize the court administration, boosting the use of non-judicial dispute resolution, and simplifying the procedural framework that regulates litigation. The basic need which is discussed first is the provision of judicial resources by appointment of additional judges, enhancements in the court infrastructure and additional staffing support. It then explores how judicial workflow can be transformed by technological integration via Case Management Systems, e-courts, virtual hearings, AI tools, blockchain record systems, and data analytics and decrease administrative delay. The chapter also discusses the role of ADR mechanisms in taking much of the dispute out of the court process, and the role of simplifying the process of litigation in eliminating systemic bottlenecks that do not add to the length of litigation. To base these proposals on real-life experience, the chapter discusses the best examples of judicial reforms in other jurisdictions and finds out what best practices have been introduced by Indian states that have shown some quantifiable changes in case management. This is aimed at featuring a detailed reform agenda which is theoretically sound with practical flexibility to the Indian judicial setting.