IJMSRT foster a global community of researchers and provide them with a platform to publish and access high-quality scientific content. We strive to be at the forefront of scientific communication, enabling the rapid dissemination of cutting-edge research and driving advancements in various fields.
Read moreAbstract The exponential growth of digital images in cyberspace has raised concerns about cyber security, particularly in detecting tampering, forgery, and advanced manipulations. Conventional forensic methods are limited due to their reliance on manual inspection and predefined features, which makes them less effective against evolving cyber-attacks. This study introduces a predictive cyber security framework that combines digital forensic techniques with deep learning models to strengthen image protection. The approach employs convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and other deep architectures to learn high-level representations of image data, enabling the identification of threats such as steganography, splicing, deepfakes, and adversarial distortions. By embedding forensic principles into model training, the system enhances transparency and supports evidence traceability. This paper focuses on a predictive cyber security framework that integrates digital forensic techniques with deep learning models to improve the detection, interpretation, and prevention of digital image tampering and manipulation, thereby enhancing authenticity verification, transparency, and proactive defense in digital imaging.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Rao and J. Ni, “A deep learning approach to detection of splicing and resampling in digital images,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Inf. Forensics Security (WIFS), Dec. 2016.
[2] L. Bondi, S. Lameri, D. Güera, P. Bestagini, E. J. Delp, and S. Tubaro, “Tampering detection and localization through clustering of camera-based CNN features,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), Jul. 2017.
[3] M. Huh, A. Liu, A. Owens, and A. A. Efros, “Fighting fake news: Image splice detection via learned self-consistency,” in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ECCV), Sep. 2018.
[4] J. Wu, X. Chang, T. Yang, and K. Feng, “Blind forensic method based on convolutional neural networks for image splicing detection,” in Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. (ICCC), Dec. 2019, pp. 2014–2018.
[5] D. Cozzolino and L. Verdoliva, “Noiseprint: A CNN-based camera model fingerprint,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 15, pp. 144–159, 2019.
[6] J. H. Bappy, C. Simons, L. Nataraj, B. S. Manjunath, and A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, “Hybrid LSTM and encoder–decoder architecture for detection of image forgeries, ,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 3286–3300, Jul. 2019
[7] L. Verdoliva, “Media forensics and deepfakes: An overview,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 910 932, Aug. 2020.
[8] M. S. Rana, M. N. Nobi, B. Murali, and A. H. Sung, "Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature Review," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 25494-25513, Mar. 2022.
[9] H. Kwon, J. Choi, and H. Kim, “Predictive forensic framework for unseen manipulations using self-supervised anomaly detection,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 165, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2023.
[10] K. H. Rhee, “Detection of spliced image forensics using texture analysis of median filter residual,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 103374–103384, 2020.
[11] S. Li, T. Qin, and G. Min, "Blockchain-Based Digital Forensics Investigation Framework in the Internet of Things and Social Systems," IEEE Access, pp. 1–12, 2019.
[12] M. Barni, K. Kallas, E. Nowroozi, and B. Tondi, “On the transferability of adversarial examples against CNN-based image forensics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.01629, 2018.
[13] T. Zhang, C. Xu, and Y. Liu, “Improving robustness of deepfake detectors via adversarial training,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 17, pp. 2310–2322, 2022.
[14] X. Li and Z. Qin, “Blockchain technology in digital forensics: Challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 1 14, 2022.
[15] E. Casey, Digital Forensics and Investigations: People, Process, and Technologies. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019.
[16] B. J. Pathan, N. Nadaf, and S. Desai, "Blockchain-Enhanced Digital Forensics: Strengthening the Chain of Custody," Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 348–356, Jun. 2024.
[17] D. P. Timothy and A. K. Santra, “Detecting Digital Image Forgeries with Copy-Move and Splicing Image Analysis using Deep Learning Techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 15, no. 5, 2024.
[18] N. Asim, J. Osamor, F. Olajide, C. Iwendi, and N. Okeke, “Detecting and mitigating anti-forensic techniques: A comprehensive framework for digital investigators,” in Proc. AI-Driven Smart Healthcare for Society 5.0, Feb. 14–15, 2025.
[19] Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and S. Wang, “Blind forensic method based on convolutional neural networks for image splicing detection,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 27145–27160, 2018.
[20] S. Shan, Y. Zhao, and R. Ni, “DSNI-Net: A forensic network for detecting splicing in salt-and-pepper noisy images,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 128921–128934, 2021.
[21] R. Kumar, A. Verma, and S. Sharma, “Image forgery detection using deep learning,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2021.
[22] A. Sharma, A. Gupta, and N. Jain, “Hybrid DenseNet-based segmentation framework for automated image forgery detection,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering (IJISAE), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 75–83, 2023.
[23] H. Patel, K. Mehta, and R. Shah, “Deep learning-based digital image forgery detection,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Technology (IJSRET), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1117–1122, 2022.
[24] H. H. Samson, "ForensicFormer: Hierarchical Multi-Scale Reasoning for Cross-Domain Image Forgery Detection," arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08873, Jan. 2026.
[25] K. M. Hosny, A. M. Mortda, N. A. Lashin, and M. M. Fouda, "A New Method to Detect Splicing Image Forgery Using Convolutional Neural Network," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1272, Jan. 2023.
[26] S. S. Ali, I. I. Ganapathi, N.-S. Vu, S. D. Ali, N. Saxena, and N. Werghi, "Image Forgery Detection Using Deep Learning by Recompressing Images," Electronics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 403, Jan. 2022.
[27] V. V. Sataraddi, N. P. Nethravath, and A. K. K. N, "Hybrid Deep Feature Fusion Framework for Intelligent Image Forgery Detection," Power System Technology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2025.
[28] M. A. A. Shaikh and D. Patil, "Image Forgery / Tampering Detection Using Deep Learning and Cloud," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJARCCE), vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 317–321, June 2022.
[29] A. Jindal, S. S. Saini, and S. Singh, "Image Splicing Detection using Convolutional Neural Networks," in 2021 9th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India, 2021.
Digital Image Forensics, Predictive Cyber Security, Deep Learning, Image Tampering Detection, Deepfake Detection, Image Forgery Adversarial Attacks.
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in Rode, Semantic Scholar, and open alex.
