IJMSRT foster a global community of researchers and provide them with a platform to publish and access high-quality scientific content. We strive to be at the forefront of scientific communication, enabling the rapid dissemination of cutting-edge research and driving advancements in various fields.
Read moreObjective: Injury to branches of the trigeminal nerve, particularly the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves, is a recognised complication of both mandibular third molar surgery and endodontic treatment. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise current evidence on the classification, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of nerve injury — with particular emphasis on neuropraxia, the mildest and most common form — arising from these two common dental procedures. Methods: A narrative review of the English-language literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, employing combinations of the keywords ―neuropraxia‖, ―inferior alveolar nerve injury‖, ―lingual nerve injury‖, ―third molar surgery‖, ―endodontic nerve injury‖, and ―sodium hypochlorite accident‖. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses and cohort studies were prioritised and supplemented with relevant case reports and case series where higher-level evidence was unavailable. Results: Reported incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar surgery ranges from 0.35% to 8.4% for transient deficits and is generally below 2% for permanent deficits. Lingual nerve injury is closely linked to surgical technique, with lingual flap retraction and the lingual split technique associated with a several-fold increase in temporary injury compared with a buccal-only approach. The great majority of these injuries represent neuropraxia and resolve spontaneously within weeks to a few months. Endodontic-related nerve injury is less common but can follow chemical (sodium hypochlorite, calcium hydroxide, sealer extrusion) or mechanical (overinstrumentation, overfilling) insult, and its course is more variable, at times accompanied by neuropathic pain. Cone-beam computed tomography improves preoperative risk stratification in radiographically high-risk cases. Management ranges from observation and pharmacological neuropathic pain control to surgical removal of extruded material and microsurgical nerve repair, with the best outcomes generally reported when repair is undertaken within approximately twelve months of injury. Conclusion: Neuropraxia accounts for the majority of nerve injuries encountered in third molar surgery and endodontics and carries a favourable prognosis. Careful preoperative risk assessment, judicious technique selection, prompt recognition of injury, objective neurosensory testing, and timely referral for specialist or microsurgical intervention when indicated together optimise clinical outcomes and reduce medicolegal exposure.
References
1. Sarikov R, Juodzbalys G. Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014;5(4):e1.
2. Póvoa RCS, Mourão CFAB, Geremias TC, Sacco R, Guimarães LS, Montemezzi P, et al. Does the coronectomy a feasible and safe procedure to avoid the inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molars extractions? A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(6):750.
3. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain. 1943;66(4):237–288.
4. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74(4):491–516.
5. Neurapraxia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
6. Martin A, Perinetti G, Costantinides F, Maglione M. Coronectomy as a surgical approach to impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2015;11:9.
7. On SW, Cho SW, Byun SH, Yang BE. Clinical significance of intraoperative exposure of inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction of the mandibular third molar in nerve injury. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4379.
8. Lee J, Feng B, Park JS, Foo M, Kruger E. Incidence of lingual nerve damage following surgical extraction of mandibular third molars with lingual flap retraction: a systematic review and meta analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0282185.
9. Pichler JW, Beirne OR. Lingual flap retraction and prevention of lingual nerve damage associated with third molar surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91(4):395–401.
10. Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Khan HA, Kuhmichel A, Steed MB. Retrospective review of microsurgical repair of 222 lingual nerve injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(4):715–723.
11. Coulthard P, Kushnerev E, Yates JM, Walsh T, Patel N, Bailey E, et al. Interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD005293.
12. Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Khan HA, et al. Microsurgical repair of the inferior alveolar nerve: success rate and factors that adversely affect outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(8):1978 1990.
13. Renton T. Oral surgery: part 4. Minimising and managing nerve injuries and other complications. Br Dent J. 2013;215(8):393–399.
14. Robinson PP. Observations on the recovery of sensation following inferior alveolar nerve injuries. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;26(3):177–189.
15. Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(4):377–383.
16. Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, Nhembe F, Gudka D, Kafas P, et al. Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(3):335–345.
17. Kim JW, Cha IH, Kim SJ, Kim MR. Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(11):2508–2514.
18. Dolanmaz D, Yildirim G, Isik K, Kucuk K, Ozturk A. A preferable technique for protecting the inferior alveolar nerve: coronectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(6):1234–1238.
19. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;28(1):20–25.
20. Alonso-Ezpeleta O, Martín PJ, López-López J, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martín-González J, Segura Egea JJ. Pregabalin in the treatment of inferior alveolar nerve paraesthesia following overfilling of endodontic sealer. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(2):e197–e202.
21. Drouri S, Ghouni C, Sadel K, El Merini H. Inferior alveolar nerve injury following calcium hydroxide extrusion: a case report with preventive insights and three-year follow-up. Front Dent Med. 2026;7:1794033.
22. Perotti S, Bin P, Cecchi R. Hypochlorite accident during endodontic therapy with nerve damage – a case report. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(1):104–108.
23. Mekawy M, Boshra G, Ghareeb N. Sodium hypochlorite accident—complications, management and potential prevention: a report of three cases. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2024.
Neuropraxia; Inferior Alveolar Nerve; Lingual Nerve; Third Molar Surgery; Endodontics; Nerve Injury
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in Rode, Semantic Scholar, and open alex.
